My reposted review of Slidedocs on the Communications Network blog…
Does presentation = PowerPoint? Not in the least.
The foks at CustomShow have put together a list of 24 Alternatives to PowerPoint.
I could probably add a few to the list, but there were a number of solutions I had never heard of. It’s a good look at what else is out there.
Well, four years and 200 million iPad sales later, Microsoft has finally, finally, finally released Microsoft Office for the iPad, which includes, of course, PowerPoint. There’s a lot to like and…a lot to criticize. What, you think I’m going to give Microsoft an easy pass on this one?
First, let’s talk about getting it up and running on your iPad.
Each of the 3 office applications (Word, Excel and PowerPoint) are stand-alone apps that need to be downloaded separately from the iTunes store. The installation, as with most apps, is simple and straightforward. But upon opening PowerPoint (or one of the other apps), you’ll soon realize that you are only allowed to view and present presentations—not to edit or create. That is, unless you purchase or already own an Office 365 subscription.
And that’s where things can start to get complicated. Office 365 is still a point of confusion for a lot of consumers. It is essentially the subscription model for an Office suite on your PC and/or Mac that Microsoft is pushing hard as an alternative to the 2013 desktop version of Office. Different Office 365 plans give you different options for how many computers or devices you can install the software on, but a popular plan is the “Home Premium” one that gives you all Office apps on up to 5 computers or tablets for $99/yr.
So, in order to edit or create Office docs on the iPad, you must have an Office 365 subscription which you can make as an in-app purchase if you need to.
It is here that I have to give Microsoft tremendous props for not just porting an existing version and interface onto the iPad, but redesigning it from the ground up. While the program will feel familiar to users of the desktop version of PPT, it has been greatly simplified and optimized for the iPad. The dense set of ribbons has been simplified down to 5 tabs, each with a bare minimum of options. Formatting and functions are always at your fingertips—no endless clicking into sub-menus or hunting around. Working on slides feels easy and elegant. Moving objects around and working with text is a nice experience. It feels more Apple-like, than Microsoft-like.
With one major exception, PowerPoint for iPad excels in playback. It is fairly easy to load PPT files through iTunes, from email or from Windows OneDrive. Unfortunately, there is no in-app support for Dropbox which would have been nice, but you can transfer PPT files from Dropbox for iPad to PPT for iPad. Once you have your files loaded, playback is beautiful and smooth. Swipe from the side to advance or go back, but it would have been nice to simply tap as well to advance. It is also easy to pretend you’re John Madden and notate and highlight parts of a slide on the fly with your finger (although these notes vanish when you advance to the next slide).
There are many transitions to apply, and all play beautifully, as do complicated animations created on the desktop—even motion paths. While there is much that you cannot edit from the iPad, the app does not seem to eliminate or change most of what you have created on the desktop side. This is very good news, and will definitely give SlideShark a run for its money.
Sending your slides to a screen via AirPlay is possible, but not from the app. You’ll have to set this in the iPad general settings. You cannot pinch to zoom during slideshow mode, although you can in edit mode.
And when you arrive at a slide with video…nothing happens. While you do see a static screen shot of the first frame of your video, PowerPoint for the iPad simply does not support any video or audio playback. D’oh! Score one for Keynote…
Lack of video support might be my biggest disappointment.
All the simplification comes at the price of removal of many functions. PowerPoint on the desktop is filled with hundreds, if not thousands of functions and endless options. No one would expect the iPad version to duplicate all these features, but there are some glaring omissions, including:
Is this the best solution for creating and running presentations on the iPad? Yes and no.
For those who have no interest in bothering with Keynote or converting and managing presentations through SlideShark, then PowerPoint for the iPad is a very good solution for basic viewing, very basic editing and playback. The iPad’s mail app has always been able to give you a preview of a PPT file attachment, but it often distorts, deletes and alters content. Not cool. A PDF was always a solution, but do you really want to constantly be asking your client to “make a PDF so I can view it on my iPad”?
As for me, while I will definitely make use of the new PowerPoint for iPad app, I will still rely on my favorite solution for presenting slides on the iPad: Photo Albums and JPEGs in the photo app. I still keep my portfolio on my iPad by converting presentations into individual albums of JPEGs. This allows me to quickly scan through dozens of presentations and then hundreds of slides, pinching and zooming and pulling up any slide I need very quickly.
But at the end of the day, I still have to hand it to Microsoft for a well-designed, if feature-lacking solution.
* * *
I need to give special thanks to my friend Ric Bretschneider, former Senior Program Manager for PowerPoint at Microsoft who provided feedback on the above and who reminded me that A) this is still just a 1.0 version that will surely be improved in future versions, and B) Apple notoriously limits access to significant parts of the iOS API, preventing developers from instituting certain desired features.
The app has only been out for a few days, so if you feel I got anything wrong, please let me know! And if you have started using PowerPoint on the iPad yourself, I would love to know your experiences.
Nancy Duarte and her firm Duarte Design have just released Slidedocs, their latest presentation book.
Continuing their trend of releasing books for free and in multimedia formats (see resonate), this latest is available for free download at their site in PowerPoint format. Though it seems odd to release a book as a PowerPoint file, in this case it is entirely appropriate as the entire focus of the book is creating print documents using PowerPoint, something Nancy calls “Slidedocs.”
I have known that Slidedocs has been in the works for a while, and I’m excited for its release as it addresses an uncomfortable truth about corporate environments that often goes unaddressed by many presentation experts: PowerPoint is used far more than just as a tool to create formal on-screen slideshows. I’m not talking about the amateur poster designs at the water cooler announcing a canned food drive (although that’s certainly a valid use), but rather high-stakes reports, memos, strategy documents, proposals and even white papers—things that once were the domain of Microsoft Word.
But Microsoft Word has become an entirely unusable program for most (myself included) if one wishes to inject any degree of design or complexity. This fact, coupled with the need for all types of communications to be more concise, produced more quickly and delivered more visually, has made PPT the default and de facto method of business communication creation.
We can debate whether this is a good thing or not, but it’s a fact. Unfortunately, PPT’s intrinsic design as “slideware,” leads most to create stereotypical on-screen slides even when their work will never see a projector or large LCD screen. (Microsoft’s default pages don’t help, pushing its users to make 44pt headers and 32pt body copy).
The trend toward using PPT to create print documents was something I started seeing years ago, and instead of fighting it, I have long advocated using PPT in 3 distinct formats:
Note: I’ll save the definition of a “Walking Deck” for another time, but let’s just say it’s a bit of a hybrid between the other two formats.
What I have always simply called a “Printed Document,” Nancy has termed a “Slidedoc.” I like the term, although I am still on the fence about whether it is too limiting, since what we really are talking about here is using PPT to create well-designed print documents as one might do in InDesign (although Nancy would disagree as we’ll see below).
The book is well-designed, well-organized and offers a lot of practical examples. Unlike most business books, Slidedocs is appropriately heavy on the visuals.
Slidedocs begins by making a case for using PPT for more text-heavy documents. But Nancy sees a Slidedoc as sitting in a unique place between on-screen presentations and documents: More textual than a presentation, but less so than a document. I won’t quibble here, because if this gets people thinking more like a document in appropriate cases, everyone benefits. (And yes, there still is a place in the world for a 50 page text white paper…it’s not a place I’d like to be very often, however…)
The book makes an excellent case for the use of hierarchy and organization (table of contents, navigation, headers, sub-heads, pull-quotes, etc), things severely lacking in most PPT creations. Nancy also reminds us of basic writing techniques such as active vs. passive voice, things which shouldn’t fly out the window, “just because it’s PowerPoint.” I was happy to see columned text and a grid layout as major characteristics of Slidedocs. Few people realize that PPT allows for columned text boxes and that spanning text across a landscape page in a single column makes for very difficult reading.
Book layout is often used throughout as a format to emulate, and it’s a good model for Slidedocs. I particularly love Nancy’s comparison of a company logo to a publisher’s logo: no need to put Random House on every page of the book, right?
It’s obvious that Duarte Design has developed the style of Slidedocs over the years in direct response to client needs, and there are good examples of Duarte’s work proving how useful the format can be as a pre-read to a presentation, as an “Emissary” (sent to an executive or client), as reference material or as a follow up to a meeting. The book is quick to point out often the utility of the format in the context of typical business situations where on-screen slides are not appropriate. And we all get the reminder that Slidedocs, like most things these days, needs to be scannable. Left unsaid is the sad fact that nobody is likely to read everything you write anyway…
For fans of Nancy’s other books, you’ll find some slight repetition in the areas of diagrams and charts, but nothing to prevent you from adding this to your presentation bookshelf.
Lastly, Duarte has kindly made available two Slidedoc templates for free download to get you started creating your own.
I do wish a bit more time had been spent on implementing grids and actual layout from a design perspective. But, as Nancy admits, she is not a graphic designer, but does employ and work with some very good ones. And again, the book itself is very well laid out. I also wish Nancy had explored more opportunities for creating portrait style documents with PowerPoint. She mentions it in passing, but I have actually had a lot of success using PPT in this format, and I think Duarte could really add something on the topic.
I have to disagree with the suggested use of Arial Narrow for headers. As I often say, if you’re using Arial Narrow, you’re writing too much. And since the type size on a Slidedoc is much reduced anyway, there’s no harm in reducing header sizes and still being able to use a better font. But I do love that Duarte makes healthy use of Georgia, a very overlooked standard font. And I also have to disagree with the statement that white space indicates a luxury brand. White space should always be used, even if your subject is beef jerky. It may just be that luxury brands generally have a higher sense of brand design, so they often make very good use of white space.
One last thing left unsaid in Slidedocs is that at the end of the day, PPT is still an imperfect tool for creating these types of documents. It’s very good, but remember that you still do not have text linking from page to page, text wrap around images or paragraph and character styling. And just because things look great on your screen does not mean that the same file opened on your client’s or boss’s machine will look exactly the same—unless you create a PDF, something I would always recommend. Indeed, the initial release of Slidedocs had a few formatting glitches that appeared for some people. That’s just the way it goes when you publish a book in an editable format—that’s right, Slidedocs is just an ordinary old PPT file that you can edit intentionally or unintentionally yourself.
There’s a incredibly odd bug in PowerPoint 2011 on the Mac that causes colors to render differently when they are applied to shapes and text. Even when the exact values are applied to a PowerPoint shape and to a block of text, they will appear slightly different on the screen.
There’s still no official fix from Microsoft on this yet, but Jan Schultink at Idea Transplant has been working on the problem and has come up with a solution. Read about it here.
PPTFaq also has some info on this issue here.
Most people are aware of Microsoft’s occasional upgrades for Windows and Office products that come in the form of Service Packs. But Microsoft also releases “Hot Fixes” for smaller issues and bugs that people run into.
About six months ago, I started experiencing playback issues with videos embedded into PowerPoint 2010 on the PC. For whatever reason, certain videos would simply stop on a particular frame giving a “playback error.” They would play fine in Windows Media player and fine in PowerPoint on the Mac. We tried re-encoding the videos 10 different ways, but there would always remain a single frame that PowerPoint couldn’t get past.
My friend Echo Swinford experienced similar issues. And since Echo knows more about PowerPoint than most anyone on the planet, I knew I wasn’t going crazy.
We brought the issue to the attention of PowerPoint’s development team and while it took a bit of time, they identified the issue and released a fix for the issue yesterday in the form of a “Hot Fix.”
If you have experienced the issue of a video suddenly and consistently stopping on a single frame (and the video plays fine outside of PowerPoint), download and install the fix here.
As is often the case, if you have not experienced the issue, Microsoft generally recommends not installing the patch.
And this is specifically for PowerPoint 2010.
I woke up New Year’s Day to a nice surprise email from Microsoft informing me that I had been given a Microsoft PowerPoint MVP Award for 2014.
Each year Microsoft recognizes a select few and their contributions to their respective software and technological communities. I am one of only 11 PowerPoint MVPs in the U.S., and I’m happy to join the company of other long-time MVPs such as Echo Swinford, Julie Terberg, Ric Bretschneider, Dave Paradi, Geetesh Bajaj, Sandra Johnson, Glenna Shaw and Ellen Finkelstein.
So, what does it all mean? Well, I’m sure I’ll be able to tell you more 12 months from now, but I can say now that Microsoft relies on their MVPs as a link to to its users. It should come as no shock that the people who create software are not the people using it day in and day out in real world environments. And so, the MVPs provide constant feedback and insight into feature requests, bugs, frustrations, solutions and general man on the ground reporting. The MVP group has a direct line to the people actually writing the code and working on new versions of the software. Often, new features come directly from MVP requests—and sometimes demands.
MVPs also are out and about on discussion boards, user groups and LinkedIn groups answering questions and helping others.
So, am I now a Microsoft shill?
Not in the least. Other than being given an MSDN developer subscription (and honestly, I’m not even sure what that is), I’m not paid a dime by Microsoft. Not even a t-shirt. Okay, they did give me that slick glass award up above, but seriously, I don’t even get a discount on software. Did you hear that? I still have to pay full price for software.
And having seen MVPs and the Microsoft PowerPoint Dev team in the same room on a number of occasions at The Presentation Summit, I can tell you that the MVPs aren’t known for sugarcoating things.
So all that being said, I cautiously offer myself up as your link to Microsoft. Seriously, I am always interested in how people are using PowerPoint (and other presentation software) and where things are falling short and what challenges people face. One of the things I often tell people in trainings is to just speak up if you find yourself doing something in PowerPoint that you feel shouldn’t be so difficult. 90% of the time, there is an easier way I can show you. And 10% of the time, my answer will be: “Sorry, that’s just Microsoft.” Hopefully, I can work on that 10% a little bit this year…
Yes, Dorothy, Macs too. Microsoft hasn’t traditionally given the Mac community the support it does its PC users, but there is a completely separate Mac PowerPoint development team (for better and worse), and as one of the few MPVs that does work primarily on a Mac, hopefully I’ll have a voice there.
So, let me know if you have any messages for the folks at Microsoft HQ.
Oh, and let me know if you have any software discounts for me…
The good folks at Brightcarbon have created 7 animated Christmas Cards which you can download, customize and send out on your own. Worth a look!
Here’s my favorite.
If you’re looking for online technical training in PowerPoint, my good friend Echo Swinford, who knows just about everything there is to know about PowerPoint, has a series of incredibly low-priced video training modules. Watch them here!
Seriously, if you ever have any question about PowerPoint, no matter how obscure or technical, Echo has the answer. I speak from lots of experience…